AI Content Checker
Upload an image and run honest forensic checks for AI-generation markers — metadata fingerprints and error-level analysis, explained in plain words.
What is the AI Content Checker?
Here's the honest truth most tools won't tell you: no software on earth can prove with 100% certainty whether a piece of content was made by AI. Any service claiming perfect detection is misleading you. The MuftTools AI Content Checker takes the only honest approach — it hunts for known markers and tells you exactly what it found, and what it didn't.
The checker examines two things. First, file metadata, where generators like Midjourney, DALL-E and Stable Diffusion often leave identifiable fingerprints. Second, an error-level analysis (ELA) forensic scan that highlights areas of an image with unusual compression patterns — a classic clue of AI generation or heavy editing. You get a plain-language verdict: markers found, or none found — with the clear caveat that “no markers” is not proof an image is genuine. Journalists, teachers, moderators and curious minds all use it as one clue among many, free and completely private.
How to use the AI Content Checker
- Upload the image you want to examine (JPG or PNG).
- The tool reads the file's metadata, hunting for known AI-generator fingerprints.
- An error-level analysis scan highlights regions with suspicious compression patterns.
- Read the plain-language verdict: markers found, or no markers found.
- Treat the result as a clue, not courtroom evidence — verify important claims through independent sources.
Key features
- Metadata scan for known AI-generator fingerprints
- ELA forensic visualization of suspicious regions
- Plain-language verdicts — no confusing jargon
- Honest scope: reports markers, never claims certainty
- Private by design — your image never leaves your browser
- Free forever, no sign-up required
Frequently asked questions
Can this tool prove an image is AI-generated?
No — and neither can any other tool. It detects known markers of AI generation and presents them honestly. A “markers found” result is strong evidence; a “no markers” result simply means nothing suspicious was detected.
What exactly does the checker examine?
Two layers: embedded metadata for fingerprints left by popular AI generators, and an error-level analysis scan that reveals inconsistent compression typical of synthetic or heavily edited imagery.
Is my uploaded image private?
Yes. The entire analysis runs locally in your browser. Your image is never uploaded to any server.
How should I use the result?
As one piece of evidence. Combine it with reverse-image search, source verification and context before drawing conclusions — especially for anything you plan to publish or share.